image source |
Dunkirk is
directed by Christopher Nolan and features an ensemble cast that includes Tom
Hardy, Mark Rylance, Cillian Murphy, and Kenneth Branagh, This is a movie that
just kind of throws you right into the actual event, which is an intriguing way
to go about things. The character development feels pretty thin for the most
part. Admittedly, I don’t think this was necessarily important to the movie
because the event seemed like the most essential element of the movie more than
anything. Most of the character development that actually seemed to be there
was involved in the scenes with Mark Rylance and Cillian Murphy. You understand
Rylance’s character, a man who isn’t officially part of the military, but is
still willing to do what he can to help. You also under Murphy’s character, a
man who is traumatized by the events of the war, even if you never actually see
exactly what he saw. Because of this, these two stood out to me among a cast
that was great all around. Christopher Nolan’s direction is phenomenal, as
should be expected. Nowhere is this more evident than in the battle scenes
(especially the dogfights). There’s a genuine level of grit and intensity to
them. This movie is under two hours, and I think that is the perfect length for
this movie. This is due to what they wanted to accomplish with this movie. The
pacing didn’t always work for me. There were times where I legitimately felt
that it dragged, and moments where I was starting to feel antsy. That could be
because there were only two characters who truly felt developed to me, and two
characters were only I felt fully invested in. In my opinion, the opening and
the climax are fantastic, and they serve as perfect bookends for this movie. Do
I think Dunkirk is the masterpiece
it’s been built up to be? No. Do I think this movie ranks among Christopher
Nolan’s best work? No. Is this movie flawed? Yes. Is this a good movie that is
still worth a rent? Yes.
7 / 10
No comments:
Post a Comment